Studying the Adjustment Amount of Ranking the Performance of Mutual Funds Based on Omega Ratio and Real Return

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Accounting, Associate Professor, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,

Abstract

One of the main functionalities of capital market is to enhance liquidity in the market. Mutual funds are modern financial institutions which are designed with the aim of absorbing funds from investors and devote them to buy a variety of securities in order to reduce investment risks, exploit the economies of scale and finally make a reasonable return for investors. Regarding effective role of these funds, the aim of this investigation is to compare the performance assessment of mutual funds based on Omega Ratio and the real return. A sample of 35 mutual funds for the period of 2011 to 2016, in order to make a fair comparison between the omega ratio and real performance. The hypotheses were analyzed through correlation test and by using the two non-parametric statistics of 'Spearman's correlation coefficient' and 'Kendall's rank correlation coefficient'. The analysis results have shown that in Iranian capital market, a joint venture between fund rankings based on omega ratio and real returns.

Keywords


  1. Biglova, A., Ortobelli, S., Rachev, S., Stroyanov, S. (2004). Different approaches to risk estimation in portfolio theory, The Journal of Portfolio Management, 31, 103-112.

  2. Chen, H., Lai, C., Wu, Sh. (2016). Mutual fund selection and performance persistence in 401(k) Plans, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 35, 78 – 100.

  3. Estrada, J. (2000). The Cost of Equity in Emerging Markets: A Downside Risk Approach, IESE Business School of (Barcelona, Spain.)

  4. Filip, A., Pochea, M. (2015). Romanian mutual funds flows-performance relationship, Procedia Economics and Finance, 32 , 1377 – 1383.

  5. Gremillion, L.; Khand, B. (2005). Mutual Fund Industry, available on the internet at www.bostonifi.com.

  6. Haung, J.; Sialm, C.; Zhang, H.  (2011). Risk shifting and mutual fund performance, The Review ofFinancial Studies, 24 (8), 2575-2616.

  7. Lien, D. (2002). A note on the relationship between some risk-adjusted performance measures, Journal of Future Markets, 22 (5), 483-495.

  8. Ming, M., siok, H. (2010). Evaluating mutual fund performance in an emerging Asian economy:The Malaysian experience ,journal of  Asian Economics, available on the internet at www.ScienceDirect.com.

  9. Moghaddasian, I. (2010). Studying the performances of mutual funds in Iran. MA Dissertation in Financial Management, Iran.

  10. Parida, S., Tho, T. (2016). The impact of more frequent portfolio disclosures on performance of mutual funds, Journal of Banking & Finance, In Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available online 5.

  11. Plantinga, A., Sebastiaan, D. G. (2001). Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures and Implied Risk-Attitudes,

  12. Pourzamani, z., Jahanshad, A., Ghanadi, N. (2012). Analysis of the mutual fund performance based on the Sharpe ratio, Upside Potential ratio and real performance, Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management, 3(12), 131-146.

  13. Pourzamani, Z., Rouhani, A. (2016). Examine the relation between financial reporting quality and speed with composite measures of portfolio performance. The Financial Accounting and Auditing Research, 8(29), 149-163.

  14. Rom, B. M., Kathleen F. W. (1993). Post-Modern Portfolio Theory Comes of Age, Journal of Investing, 3(3), 349-364.

  15. Sortino, F., Lee, N. (1994). Performance measurement in a downside risk frame work, Journal of Investing, 3(3), 59-64.

  16. Sortino, F., Plantiga, A., Vandermeer, R. (1999). The Dutch triangle: A Framework to measure upside potential relative to downside risk, Journal of Portfolio Management, 26 (1), 50-58.

  17. Sortino, F., Plantiga, A. Vandermeer, R. (2001). The impact of downside risk on risk-adjusted performance of mutual funds in Euro next markets, working paper