Stock Portfolio Optimization Using Water Cycle Algorithm (Comparative Approach)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran (Corresponding Author)

2 Ph.D Candidate of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Social Science, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

Abstract

Portfolio selection process is a subject focused by many researchers. Various criteria involved in this process have undergone alterations over time, necessitating the use of appropriate investment decision support tools. An optimization approach used in different sciences is using meta-heuristic algorithms. In the present study, using Water Cycle Algorithm (WCA), a model was introduced for selecting the optimal portfolio, and then the obtained results were compared with those obtained from Harmony Search (HS) and Imperialist Competitive Algorithm (ICA). For this purpose, using the data of 10-month (April 2016 to January 2017) returns of 50 top companies in the Stock Exchange Market of Iran, the optimal portfolio was estimated using the above-mentioned algorithms with the aim of maximizing profit and minimizing risk, and then the optimal portfolios obtained from these algorithms were compared with each other. Results of implementing these algorithms indicated that despite the high capability of the studied algorithms to optimize the portfolios, WCA algorithm had higher capability of portfolio optimization than the other ones

Keywords


1)       Atashpaz-Gargari, E. and Lucas, C. (2007). September. Imperialist competitive algorithm: an algorithm for optimization inspired by imperialistic competition. In Evolutionary computation, 2007. CEC 2007. IEEE Congress, 4661-4667.
2)       Anagnostopoulos, K.P. and Mamanis, G. (2011). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for complex portfolio optimization problems. Computational Management Science, 8(3),259-279.
3)       Anand, Atul, and Suganthi, L. (2018). Hybrid GA-PSO Optimization of Artificial Neural Network for Forecasting Electricity Demand, Energies 2018, 11, 728; doi:10.3390/en11040728.
4)       Baghipour, R., Hosseini, S.M. and Boor, Z. (2014). A Water Cycle Algorithm for Optimal Allocation of DGs in Distribution System Considering Environmental Profit. International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology, 4(11), 430-454.
5)       Chang, T.J., Yang, S.C. and Chang, K.J. (2009). Portfolio optimization problems in different risk measures using genetic algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), 10529-10537.
6)       Cura, T. (2009). Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio optimization. Nonlinear analysis: Real world applications, 10(4), 2396-2406.
7)       Eskandar, H., Sadollah, A., Bahreininejad, A. and Hamdi, M. (2012). Water cycle algorithm–A novel metaheuristic optimization method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems. Computers & Structures, 110, 151-166.
8)       Eskandar, H., Sadollah, A. and Bahreininejad, A. (2013). Weight optimization of truss structures using water cycle algorithm. Iran University of Science & Technology, 3(1), 115-129.
9)       Geem, Z.W. (2006). Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization, 38(03), 259-277.
10)    Haddad, O.B., Moravej, M. and Loáiciga, H.A. (2014). Application of the water cycle algorithm to the optimal operation of reservoir systems. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 141(5), 64-94.
11)    Hao, F.F. and Liu, Y.K. (2009). Mean-variance models for portfolio selection with fuzzy random returns. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, 30(1), 9-38.
12)    Heidari, A.A., Abbaspour, R.A. and Jordehi, A.R. (2017). Gaussian bare-bones water cycle algorithm for optimal reactive power dispatch in electrical power systems. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 657-671.
13)    Jahan, M.V. and Akbarzadeh-T, M.R. (2012). Extremal optimization vs. learning automata: Strategies for spin selection in portfolio selection problems. Applied Soft Computing, 12(10), 3276-3284.
14)    Jalota, H., Thakur, M. and Mittal, G. (2017). A Credibilistic Decision Support System for Portfolio Optimization. Applied Soft Computing,  Volume 59 Issue C,  512-528.
15)    Lazo, J.G., Vellasco, M.M. and Pacheco, M.A.C. (2000). A hybrid genetic-neural system for portfolio selection and management. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks, July 2000, 17-19.
16)    Liu, Y.J., Zhang, W.G. and Zhang, Q. (2016). Credibilistic multi-period portfolio optimization model with bankruptcy control and affine recourse. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 890-906.
18)    Mahfoud, S. and Mani, G. (1996). Financial forecasting using genetic algorithms. Applied artificial intelligence, 10(6), 543-566.
19)    Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The journal of finance, 7(1), 77-91.
20)    Mashayekhi, Z. and Omrani, H. (2016). An integrated multi-objective Markowitz–DEA cross-efficiency model with fuzzy returns for portfolio selection problem. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 1-9.
21)    Mohammadian, M. & Lorestani, A. & Ardehali, M.M. (2018). Optimization of single and multi-areas economic dispatch problems based on evolutionary particle swarm optimization algorithmEnergy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), 710-724.
22)    Pahnehkolaei, S.M.A., Alfi, A., Sadollah, A. and Kim, J.H. (2017). Gradient-based Water Cycle Algorithm with evaporation rate applied to chaos suppression. Applied Soft Computing, 53, 420-440.
23)    Qaderi, K., Akbarifard, S., Madadi, M.R. and Bakhtiari, B. (2017). March. Optimal operation of multi-reservoirs by water cycle algorithm. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management (pp. 1-12). Thomas Telford Ltd.
24)    Saborido, R., Ruiz, A.B., Bermúdez, J.D., Vercher, E. and Luque, M. (2016). Evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms for fuzzy portfolio selection. Applied Soft Computing, 39. 48-63.
25)    Sadati, M.E.H. and Doniavi, A. (2014). Optimization of Fuzzy Random Portfolio selection by Implementation of Harmony Search Algorithm International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 8, Number 2, 59-64.
26)    Sadati, M.E.H. and Mohasefi, J.B. (2014). The Application of Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Fuzzy Random Portfolio Selection Problem. International Journal of Computer Applications 79(9),10-1.
27)    Sadollah, A., Eskandar, H. and Kim, J.H. (2015). Water cycle algorithm for solving constrained multi-objective optimization problems. Applied Soft Computing, 27. 279-298.
28)    Salahi, M., Daemi, M., Lotfi, S. and Jamalian, A. (2014). PSO and harmony search algorithms for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem. AMO–Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 16(3). 559-573.
29)    Yang, X. (2006). Improving portfolio efficiency: A genetic algorithm approach. Computational Economics, 28(1).1-14.
30)    Zhang, Lihui & Ge, Riletu & Chai, Jianxue. (2019). "Prediction of China’s Energy Consumption Based on Robust Principal Component Analysis and PSO-LSSVM Optimized by the Tabu Search Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(1), 1-19