Noise Trading Approach of Capital Asset Pricing at Tehran Stock Exchange

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 PhD Candidate of Financial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Finance, Department of Management, Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Management, Shahrood University of Technology

3 Assistant professor of Finance. Department of Management, Central Tehran branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Noise traders as one of the key elements of the market play a significant role in determining the market volatilities, returns, and stock market mispricing. Hence, this study attempts to scrutinize the role of noise trading in capital asset pricing. Therefore, by using daily data, samples including 14105 data of 200 companies listed on stock exchange were selected and noise trading index was estimated based on Feng et al (2014). Then, using the panel method, monthly noise level of stock exchange was evaluated and the effect of noise factor on risk premium was modelled. Findings indicated that an increase in the noise level in the stock trading leads to a decrease in risk premium, however, stock fluctuations increase significantly. Moreover, the noise factor has a negative and significant effect on risk premiums. Also, market risk premium    and company size have a significant positive effect on risk premium.

Keywords

References

Abbasian E, Farzanegan E, Nasiroleslami E. (2015) Price Bubble Anomalies in Tehran Stock Exchange: Limits to Arbitrage Approach. journal of Economic Research and Policies. 3.; 23 (76) :75-92
2) Abbasian,E. Farzanegan,E(2011). Tehran Stock Exchange Bubbles and Noise Traders Behavior. Journal of Economic Research. 46(3). P 133-153.
3) Alfano, S. J., Feuerriegel, S., & Neumann, D. (2015). Is news sentiment more than just noise? Twenty-Third European Conference on Information Systems, Münster, Germany, (pp. 1–16). Conference Proceedings.
4) Barrot, J. N., Kaniel, R., & Sraer, D. (2016). Are retail traders compensated for providing liquidity? Journal of Financial Economics, 120(1), 146–168.
5) Brunnermeier, Markus K. (2016). bubbles. In Garett Jones (Ed.), Banking Crises: Perspectives from The New Palgrave Dictionary (pp. 28-36)
6) Black, Fisher. 1986. Noise. The Journal of Finance 41, no. 3: 529-543 -Black, F. (1986) Noise, journal of finance, 41( 3), 528-777.
7) Campbell, J. Y., & Kyle, A. S. (1993). Smart money, noise trading and stock price behaviour. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 1–34. doi:10.2307/2297810
8) Chau, F., Deesomsak, R., & Koutmos, D. (2016). Does investor sentiment really matter? International Review of Financial Analysis, 48(1), 221–232.
9) Chuang, W. J., Ouyang, L. Y., & Lo, W. C. (2010). The impact of investor sentiment on excess returns: A Taiwan stock market case. International Journal of Information & Management Sciences, 21(1), 13–28.
10) De Long, J.Bradford, Shleifer Andrei, Summers Lawrence., and Waldmann, Robert. (1990). Noise Trader Risk in Financial Markets. Journal of Political Economy 98: 703-738
11) Devault, L., Sias, R., & Starks, L. (2019). Sentiment metrics and investor demand. Journal of Finance, 74(2), 985–1024.
12) Ghonghadze, J., & Lux, T. (2016). Bringing an elementary agent-based model to the data: Estimation via GMM and an application to forecasting of asset price volatility. Journal of
Empirical Finance, 37(1), 1–19. oi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2016.02.002
13) Hessary, Y. K., & Hadzikadic, M. (2017). Role of behavioural heterogeneity in aggregate financial market behavior: An agent-based approach. Procedia Computer Science, 108(1), 978–987. doi:10.1016/j. procs.2017.05.254- Amini, Sh., Cai, X (2017), Nominal Price Level and Noise Trading, Leeds University Business School Working Paper No. 17-08.
14) Jang, J., & Kang, J. (2018). Probability of price crashes, rational speculative bubbles, and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 132(1), 222–247. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.10.005
15) Liu, S. (2015). Investor Sentiment and Stock Market Liquidity. Journal of Behavioural Finance, 16(1),51–67. doi:10.1080/15427560.2015.1000334
16) Naik, P. K., & Padhi, P. (2016). Investor sentiment, stock market returns and volatility: evidence from National Stock Exchange of India. International Journal of Management Practice, 9(3), 213–237. doi:10.1504/ IJMP.2016.077816
17) Nikbakht, M. Hossein Pour, A. Eslami Mofidabadi, H. (2016) The Effect of Investors Sentiment and Accounting Information on Stock Price. Journal of "Empirical Research in Accounting ". 6(2). P 219-255 (in Persian)
18) Piccoli, P., Da Costa, N. C., Jr, Da Silva, W. V., & Cruz, J. A. (2018). Investor sentiment and the risk-return trade-off in the Brazilian market. Accounting & Finance, 58(1), 599–618.
19) Saranj, A . Tehrani, R. Abbasi Museloo, Kh. Nadiri,M(2018) . Identifying the Trading Behaviors and Risk of Noise Traders in Iran Stock Market. journal of "Financial Management Strategy"6(3). p 31-58. (in Persian)
20) Seifoddini, J; Rahnamay Roodposhti, F and Nikoomaram, H (2015) Parametric Estimates of High Frequency Market Microstructure Noise as an Unsystematic Risk, Journal of Money and Economy, 10(4). 29-50. http://jme.mbri.ac.ir.
21) Verma, R., & Soydemir, G. (2009). The impact of individual and institutional investor sentiment on the market price of risk. Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance,49(3), 1129–1145. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2008.11.001
22) Uygur, U., & Taş, O. (2014). The impacts of investor sentiment on returns and conditionalVol.5 / No.17 / Spring 2020
volatility of international stock markets. Quality & Quantity,48(3), 1165–1179. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9827-3
International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting
Volume 5, Issue 17
May 2020
Pages 85-94

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics