Disclosure and firm ranking based on the the Vigeo model of social responsibility and its relationship with financial performance criteria

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economic and Accounting, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Department of Accounting, Associate Professor,Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The excessive attention of various institutions on the world of business to social responsibility has made it a necessary element for the success of companies. Due to the lack of firm ranking in this field, as well as experimental research and studies on its relationship with financial performance criteria, it is not yet fully defined in the literature and the results are different, therefore, in this paper, an attempt has been made to explain the disclosure and ranking of companies based on the Vigeo model of social responsibility and its relationship with the financial performance criteria of 118 companies during the years 2008 to 2018. To measure the social responsibility indicators of the Vigeo model, content analysis method and indicators such as return on assets, return on equity, return on invested capital, return on sales and Tobin’s Q were used as criteria for financial performance. The results indicate that the highest disclosure of indicators in the corporate governance dimension and the lowest in the human rights dimension and in general, the level of disclosure of indicators in sample companies is very low. Also, our findings show that the responsibility of companies based on Vigeo's social responsibility is positively related to the variable of return on assets, return on sales and return on invested capital and negatively on the return on equity and Tobin’s Q. Among the performance criteria, return on assets were the highest and Tobin’s Q had the lowest correlation with the corporate social responsibility of the Vigeo model.

Keywords

References

  • Ahmadi Niasani, A., Rostami, S., & Sabouri, M. (2015). A study of the relationship between corporate social responsibility indicators and financial performance components; Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Journal of Management and Accounting Research, Volume 7(14), 25-42.
  • Ashrafi, J., Rahnama Rudposhti, F., & Bani Mahd, B. (2019). Theories of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing, 8(31), 1-14.
  • Ashrafi, J., Bani Mahd, B., & Nikoomaram, H. (2018). The Ranking of Corporate Social Responsibility by Using of DEA Cross Efficiency. International Journal of Finance and Managerial Accounting, 3(11), 11-22.
  • Azar, A., & Momeni, M. (2011). Statistics and its application in management, Publications of the Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books: University of Tehran.
  • Byrne, E.F., (2011). Business ethics should study illicit businesses:to advance respect for human rights. J. Bus. Ethics 103 (4), pp 497-509.
  • Cellier, Alexis (2015), The Effects of Social Ratings on Firm Value, Research in International Business and Finance,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.05.001
  • Chen, H., Xiao, X. (2012). The Application of SPSS Factor Analysis in the Evaluation of Corporate Social Responsibility, JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE, VOL. 7, NO. 6, JUNE 2015. doi:11٫4314/jsw.7٫6٫1258-1264.
  • Choi, J., Kwak, Y. & Choe, C. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Korea. Australian Journal of Management, 35(3), 291-311.
  • Foster, F.D., Viswanathan, S., (1996). Strategic trading when agent forecast the forecast of others. Journal of Finance 51, 1437–1500.
  • Granholm, J., Wikström, A. (2013). “Corporate Social Responsibility och Corporate Financial Performance: En studie om företagsstorleks inverkan på sambandet mellan CSR och CFP inom företag noterade på Nasdaq OMX Nordic Stockholm”, Student thesis , Orebro University School of Business, Örebro University, Sweden, urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-27183.
  • Han, J.J., Kim, H. J., & Yu, J. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Asian Journal Of Sustainability And Social Responsibility,1, 61-76.
  • Heidari Kurd Zanganeh, G., Norravesh, I., & Jafari, M. H. (2017). Social Responsibility and Financial Performance in Companies Accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange. Economic Journal, 3 and 4, 53-78.
  • Lyon .TP, Maxwell. (2007). Environmental public voluntary programs reconsidered, Policy Studies Journal, 35 (4), pp 723-750.
  • Mallin, b.C., Farag, H. and Ow-Yonga, K (2014). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Islamic banks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 103. S21–S38.
  • Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A & Walsh, J.P. (2007). Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on the relationship between corporate social and financial performance, working paper, Harvard Business School.
  • Mercedes, R.F. (2015). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. BRQ Business Research Quarterly.
  • Nikkar, J., & Yousefi, M. (2019). The effect of quantitative indicators of corporate social responsibility on fluctuations in financial and economic performance in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Accounting Research, 9(1), 157-176.
  • Orlitzky, M. (2005). Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Trade-Off or Virtuous Circle? University of Auckland Business Review 7(1), PP 37-43.
International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting
Volume 6, Issue 20 - Serial Number 20
February 2021
Pages 169-181

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics