Formulating Accounting Regulations with the Approach of Political Intellectual Schools and their Impact on User Behavior

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student of Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

2 Assistant Professor Department of Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran

Abstract

Today, according to recent discussions of the standardization process, accounting cannot be considered an apolitical process. Reported figures in accountants' reports have an effect on economic behavior. Accounting rules affect the behavior of humans and are therefore considered as a political process. As a result, these rules are introduced in the political arena, taking account of accounting issues. In this research, efforts have been made to evaluate the impact of political views of individuals on the formulation and implementation of accounting standards development processes. The tool of this research is a questionnaire and through statistical tests conducted in 2018 The results of the research show that The views of policy makers and managers on the one hand, and auditors, accountants and other users, on the other hand, have comment over the formulation and application of accounting standards. Therefore, in order to reduce these disagreements, steps should be taken to align views. Different and consensus opinions at the time of compilation and so on Use of accounting standards..

Keywords


  • Ang, james. Ding, David. Thong, Tiong Yang (2013).Political connection and firm Asian development review. Vol. 30, No. 2, Pages 131-166
  • Backof, G., Bamber, E.M., Carpenter, T.D. (2016). Do auditor judgment frameworks help in constraining aggressive reporting? Evidence under more precise and less precise accounting standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 51, 1-11
  • Boubakri, Narjess, Omrane Guedhami Dev Mishra, Walid Safar( 2012). Political connection and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Coporare Financial journal homepage: elsevier.com/locate/jcorpfin
  • N , Claude.J, Saffar.W,2012,The impact of political connections on firms operating performance and financing decisions , The Journal of Financial Research • Vol. XXXV, No. 3 • 397-423
  • N, Claude. J, Saffar. W (2012). The impact of political connection on firm operating performance and financing decisions. The Journal of Financial Reaserch. Vol. XXXv,No3, 397-423.
  • Bischof, J., Daske, H., & Sextroh, A. C. J. (2020). Why Do Politicians Intervene in Accounting Regulation? The Role of Ideology and Special Interests , Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 58, issue 3, 589-642
  • Braggion, Fabio and Lyndon Moore March (2011).The economic Benefits of Political Connection in Late Victorian Britain. Journal of EconomicHistory, 73(1), 142-176
  • Brink , G.A., Tang, F., and  Yang, L., (2017) The effects of social influence pressure source and reporting consequence on financial statement preparers' fair value estimate choices ,International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance ,   6(2), pp. 168–187
  • Braun, G.P., Haynes, C.M., Lewis, T.D., Taylor, M.H. (2015). Principles- based vs. rules- based accounting standards: The effects of auditee proposed accounting treatment and regulatory enforcement on auditor judgments and confidence. Research in Accounting Regulation, 27(1), 45-50.
  • Cheny, P.K, M. Faccio, and D .C Parcley (2012).The Quality of Accounting Information in Politically Connected Firms. Working paper Vanderbilt University
  • European Commission, “What is an SME?” ,Small and medium sized enterprises (SME) - Enterprise and Industry, Retrieved June 2015, ec.europa.eu
  • Cohen, J., Krishnamoorthy, G., Peytcheva, M., Wright, A. (2013). How does the strength of the financial regulatory regime influence auditors’ judgments to constrain aggressive reporting in a principles versus rules-based accounting environment? Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 579-601.
  • -Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J(2015). Do Politically Connected Boards Affect Firm Value? The Review of Financial Studies.22(6), 2331–2360.
  • Goyal, , Jategaonkar, S.P., Muckley, C.B., (2020) Why do privatized firms pay higher dividends?Journal of corporate  Finance , Vol.60 PP.1-19
  • Hackenbrack, K., Nelson,M.V.(1996).Auditors’ incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. The Accounting Review, 71(1), 43-59
  • IFRS Foundation, International Accounting Standards Board(IASB), “Who we are”, IFRS Organization, July 2015, ifrs.org
  • IFRS Foundation staff analysis of the SEC Final staff report, “Work Plan for the consideration of incorporating IFRS into the financial reporting system for US issuers”, IFRS Foundation,October 22, 2012
  • Mihret, D.G Mirshekary, S., Yaftian, A.,(2020) Accounting professionalization, the state, and transnational capitalism: The case of Iran,  Accounting, organizations and society,  vol. 82, pp. 1-16,
  • Notbohm, M., Campbell, K., Smedema, A. R., & Zhang, T. (2018). Management’s personal ideology and financial reporting quality. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting.
  • Niessen S. Ruenzi, 2012 Political Connectednessand Firm Performance: Evidence From Germany. CFR-Working Paper NO. 07-15
  • Ng, T.B., Tan, H.T. (2003). Effects of authoritative guidance availability and audit committee effectiveness on auditors’ judgments in an auditor-client negotiation context. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 801-81
  • Peytcheva, M.,Wright, A., Majoor, B. (2014). The impact of principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards on auditors’ motivations and evidence demands. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 26(2), 51-72.
  • Pham, A.V., (2019) Political risk and cost of equity: The mediating role of political Connections, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol.56 : 64-86
  • Segovia, J., Arnold, V., Sutton, S.G. (2009). Do principles versus rules-based standards have a differential impact on U.S. auditors’ decisions? Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 12, 61-84.
  • Trompeter, G. (1994). The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment. A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13(2), 56