A model for effective development of performance appraisal with an emphasis on policies and budgetary credits

Document Type : Original Article


1 Ph.D Student, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran.


In this research, the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance as one of the cultural agencies in the field of cultural performance evaluation, with an emphasis on policies and budgetary credits has been studied. This research is applied in terms of purpose and is a survey in terms of descriptive information collection method. In terms of research method, it is a combination and both qualitative and quantitative methods have been used to achieve the objectives of this research. In the qualitative section, the opinions of experts were used to determine the components through exploratory interviews, and the extracted components were analyzed and the basis for preparing the questions was a questionnaire. The statistical population of this study was 187 people and the number of sample sizes was 125. In assessing the content validity of the questionnaire questions, as a measurement tool, the Leuche method was used and Cronbach's alpha was used to calculate its internal consistency. The method of qualitative data analysis in this research is the method of interpretive analysis and in terms of quantitative analysis of data is the method of confirmatory factor analysis. The results of pairwise comparisons in the main dimensions of the model indicate that the policy and program dimension has the highest degree of importance (18.1%) and then the executive dimension of evaluation (15.2%) ranks first and second among all dimensions, respectively. They have the least importance among the eight dimensions of the next model of internal processes (8.5%).


Abul Hassani, Elahe and Mubaraki, Hossein and
Kamali, Mohammad and Sharabafizadeh, Nasrin.
(1396). Investigating the relationship between
performance appraisal and job motivation of
therapists in rehabilitation centers and public
hospitals in Tehran based on the Herzberg twofactor
model. Journal of Rehabilitation
2) Agostino, Deborah & Arnaboldi, Michael. (2012).
Design Issues in Balanced Scorecards: The What
and How of Control. Elsevier
3) Ali Beigi, Amir Hossein and Barani, Shahrzad and
Kazmi Dehkordi, Mehdi. (2019). Designing and
compiling a comprehensive model for evaluating
the quality of teachers' teaching. Journal of
Research in Curriculum Planning
4) Alwani, Mehdi (2016). Decision making and
setting government policy. Tehran: Samat
5) Azadi, Maryam and Mehdipour, Mehrnoosh and
Kadkhodai Eliadrani, Zahra. (2019). Factors
affecting employee behavior. Journal of
Psychological Studies and Educational Sciences
6) Bisbe, Josep & Malagueno, Ricardo. (2012). Using
Strategic Performance Measurement Systems for
Strategy Formulation: Does it Work in Dynamic
Environments? Elsevier
7) Eskandari, Leila and Azar, Adel and Asadi
Zahraei, Ehsan. (2014). Designing a dynamic
model to evaluate the performance of financial
institutions with a balanced scorecard approach.
The first national electronic conference on new
achievements in management and accounting
8) Franco-Santos, Monica & Luciannetti, Lorenzo &
Bourne, Mike. (2012). Contemporary Performance
Measurement Systems: A Review of Their
Consequences and a Framework for Research.
9) Qolipour, Rahmatullah (2016). Organizational
decision making and general policy making.
Tehran: Samat Publishing
10) Givarian, Hassan and Rabiee Mandjin,
Mohammad Reza. (2015). Advanced government
policy-making process. Tehran: Mehraban
11) Grosswiele, Laura & Roglinger, Maximilian &
Friedl, Bettina. (2013). A Decision Framework for
The Consolidation of Performance Measurement
System. Elsevier
12) Javaheri, Fatemeh, Jalali, Sidiasar. (2021).
Cultural policy mismatches in Iran Proposing a
study model. Journal of Cultural Studies -
Communication, 22 (53)
13) Karak, Sanjay & Sen, Krishnendu . (2019).
Performance Appraisal of Employees: a literature
review. Gurunathan
14) Monavarian, Abbas (2017). Implement and
evaluate public policy. Tehran: Mehraban
15) Nagel, K., Wolf, D. E., Wagner, P., & Simon, P.
(1998). Two-lane traffic rules for cellular
automata: A systematic approach. Physical Review
E, 58(2), 1425.
16) Pourheidar, Rahimeh and Hassani, Mohammad
and Morteza Nejad, Niloufar. (2019). Structural
relationships of organizational trust, professional
ethics and organizational structure with school
effectiveness with the mediating role of teacher
performance evaluation. Journal of Education and
17) Rahimian, Hamid and Abbaspour, Abbas and
Ghiasi Nodooshan, Saeed and Akbari, Mohammad
Naghi. (2018). Develop and validate tools for
evaluating the performance of Afghan university
presidents. Journal of Educational Measurement
and Evaluation Studies
18) Veronese Bentes, Alexandre & Carnerio, Jorge &
Ferriera da Silva, Jorge & kimura, Herbert. (2012).
Multidimensional Assessment of Organizational
PerformanceL Integrating BSC and AHP. Elsevier
19) Williams, Ian. (2018). What is Cultural
Performance and Why is it Important?. Exit Left
Performance Academy