Empirical Explanation of Different Models of Decision Making by Individual Investors Based on Regret Aversion Concept- Evidence from Capital Market of Iran

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Prof., Faculty of Economic, Management, and Social Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof., Islamic Azad University, Darion Branch, Shiraz, Iran.

3 Ph.D. Student in Accounting, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qom, Iran.

10.30495/ijfma.2023.21135

Abstract

The ultimate goal of social sciences theories is the empirical proof of structural and analytic theories. Investors usually make investment decisions using fundamental, technical and judgmental analysis (market sentiment). Since the investors are regret aversion, in order to evaluate and prove the various models of decision making by them, we can use the amount and intensity of regret of investors after making decisions based on the above mentioned patterns. So, in the present study, we first studied the effect of the regret aversion on applying different patterns of decision making by individual investors in order to determine the dominant pattern in the capital market of Iran and then the empirical proof of this pattern based on the amount and severity of regret after adoption of decision in 2017. Data were collected using questionnaires in two stages. The findings of the research showed that there is merely a positive and significant correlation between regret aversion bias and the decision making model of individual investors based on judgmental analysis (market sentiment). Therefore, it can be concluded that decision-making based on market sentiment is the dominant model of decision making by individual investors in Iran's capital market. However, the dominant decision-making pattern chosen by individual regret aversion investors has more amount and intensity of regret after adoption of decision. Therefore, regret aversion concept isn’t confirmed empirically (that is, having a lower sense of regret after decision-making based on the dominant model).

Keywords


  • Brahmabhatt, P., Kumari, R., & Malekar, D. S. (2012). A study of Investor Behavior on investment avenues in Mumbai Fenil. TRANS Asian Journal of Marketing & Management Research, 1(1), 49-71.
  • Chaudhary, A. K. (2013). Impact of behavioural finance in investment decisions and strategies-A fresh approach. International Journal of Management Research and Business Strategy, 2(2), 85-92.
  • Chhapra, I. U., Kashif, M., Rehan, R., & Bai, A. (2018). An empirical investigation of investors behavioral biases on financial decision making. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 8(3), 99-109.
  • fallah poor, s., & abdollahi, g. (2012). Determining and Prioritizing Behavior Biases of Investors in Tehran Stock Exchange Market: a Fuzzy AHP Approach. Financial Research, 13(31), 99-120.
  • Farooq, A., & Sajid, M. (2015). Factors Affecting Investment Decision Making: Evidence from Equity Fund Managers and Individual Investors in Pakistan.
  • Fogel, S. O., & Berry, T. (2010). The disposition effect and individual investor decisions: the roles of regret and counterfactual alternatives. Handbook of Behavioral Finance, 65-80.
  • Ghelichi, M. A., Nakhjavan, B., & Gharehdaghi, M. (2016). Impact Of Psychological Factors On Investment Decision Making In Stock Exchange Market. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education Vol, 5, 3.
  • Ghufran, B., Awan, H. M., Khakwani, A. K., & Qureshi, M. A. (2016). What causes stock market volatility in Pakistan? Evidence from the field. Economics Research International, 2016.
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 263-291.
  • Lehenkari, M., & Perttunen, J. (2004). Holding on to the losers: Finnish evidence. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(2), 116-126.
  • Maheran, N., Muhammad, N., & Ismail, N. (2008). Investment Decision Behavior: Does Investors Rational or Irrational. Faculty of Business Management, Mara University of Technology, Malaysia.