The Moderating Effect of Political Connections on the Relationship between Managerial Empowerment and Enterprise Risk Management

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Masters student in Financial Management, Department of Management ,Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor in Economy, Department of Economy ,Shahr-e-Qods Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,

3 Assistant Professor in Economy, Department of Economy, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran,

10.30495/ijfma.2023.21146

Abstract

The enterprise risk management mostly focuses on documenting business unit risks. Capable managers can effectively control the documentation process by company employees. Documentation can increase the reliance on financial reporting provided by management, and therefore capable managers can control the process of documenting information and increase enterprise risk management. On the other hand, the activities of managers with political connections are less transparent and managers hide political information from shareholders. This can increase the corporate risk and reduce risk management. The present study is aimed to investigate the relationship between managerial empowerment and enterprise risk management by examining the moderating role of political connections in companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). After applying some of the limitations, the statistical population of the present study, consists of 140 companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange during 2013 to 2019. Multiple linear regression model is used to test the research hypotheses. We find that there is a positive and significant relationship between managerial empowerment and enterprise risk management. In fact, in companies with more capable managers, enterprise risk management is higher. The results showed that political connection has a negative and significant effect on the relationship between managerial empowerment and enterprise risk management. In other words, in companies with political connections, managers are less capable to improve enterprise risk management practices

Keywords


  1. Aghayi, Elham; Rezaei, Gholamreza and Kiamehr, Mohammad. (2019). Managerial ability, companies' risk-taking and firm value, Master's thesis, Zand Shiraz Institute of Higher Education.
  2. Ebrahimi, Maryam and Eskandari, Hoda. (2019). Investigate the impact of management overconfidence on risk and Company performance, Empirical Accounting Research, No. 3, 40-365.
  3. Badavar Nahandi, Younes; Taghizadeh Khaneghah, Vahid. (2013). Investigate the relationship between audit quality and investment performance. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 20 (2), 19-42.
  4. Jafarnejad, Navid, Moqbel Baarz, Abbas and Azar, Adel. (2018). Identify and extract the main components of enterprise risk management using the meta-synthesis method. Industrial Management Perspective, Year 8, No. 5, 31-50.
  5. Salehi, Mehdi and Abdoli Mahmoudabad, Nasser. (2018). The impact of auditor's expertise in Industry on the risk of Companies listed in TSE, Audit Knowledge, No. 70, 5-24.
  6. Ghaderi, Kaveh; Ghaderi, Salahuddin and Ghaderi, Saman. (2018). The effect of behavioral factor on managers' overconfidence on the effectiveness of risk management. Financial Accounting and Audit Research, Year 10, No. 37, 243-272.
  7. Kazemi, Hossein and Mehri, Omid. (2018). The effect of management ability on real earnings management and integrated risk management of Companies, New Applied Studies in Management, Economics and Accounting, Volume 1, Number 3, 51-68.
  8. Mohammadi, Sajjad and Salehi, Allah Karam. (2017). "The relationship between management ability and investment efficiency and price crash risk", Accounting Advances, No. 2, 93-119.
    1. Albring, H., and M. Campello. , Lin, P. (2020). The effect of earnings management forecasting, management motivations and risk-taking of companies, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(10): 38-4.
    2. Bailey,C. (2018).The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on the Audit Process: Evidence from Audit Fees and Audit Delay. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Vol. 23, No. 1. Pp. 141-191.
    3. Bin-Feng, C and Sultan, S. (2019). Political association, managerial power heterogeneity, and corporate risk-taking in China, Economic Research-Ekonomska IstraÅživanja, Vol. 2, PP. 202-235.
    4. Chaney PK, Faccio M, Parsley D (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. J Account Econ 51(1–2):58–76.
    5. Claessens, S., Feijen, E., Laeven, L., (2008). Political connections and preferential access to finance: The role of campaign contributions. Journal of Financial Economics, 88 (3), 554-580.
    6. Cull, R., Li, W., Sun, B., & Xu, L. C. (2015). Government connections and financial constraints: Evidence from a large representative sample of Chinese firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 32, 271-294.
    7. Desender, D., and Lafuente, S. (2013). The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, V (43), 247-261.
    8. Ding S, Jia C, Wilson C, Wu Z (2015). Political connections and agency conflicts: the roles of owner andmanager political influence on executive compensation. Rev Quant Finance Account 45(2):407–434.
    9. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., & McVay, S. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248.
    10. Demerjian, P., Lev, B., Lewis, M. F., & McVay, S. (2013). Managerial ability and earnings quality. The Accounting Review, 88(2), 463–498.
    11. Du, X., Zeng, Q., Du, Y., (2014). Do politically connected independent directorshelp Chinese listed private firms enter high-barrier industries? China Account. Finance Rev. 16, 121–153.
    12. Deng, K., Zeng, H. & Zhu, Y. (2017). Political connection, market frictions and financial constraints: evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, Early View, Version of Record online: 12 OCT 2017.
    13. Fan, J.P.H., Wong, T.J., Zhang, T., (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporategovernance, and post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatizedfirms. J. Financ. Econ. 84, 330–357.
    14. Hines, C. S., Masli, A., Mauldin, E. G., & Peters, G. F. (2015). Board risk committees and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34(4): 59-84.
    15. Hoyt, R. E. , and Liebenberg, A. P. (2015). The Value of Enterprise Risk Management. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78(4), 795-822.
    16. Houston, J., Jiang, L., Lin, C., Ma, Y. (2014). Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 193-243.
    17. Hsu, M., & Holmstrom, B & Zhu, Y. (2020). Between stock liquidity and company risk. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 315–333.
    18. Jin, L., & Myers, S.C. (2006). R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of financial Economics ,79(2), 257-292.
    19. Kim, J.B., Li, Y., Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639–662.
    20. Meulbroek, L. M. (2012). Integrated Risk Management for the Firm: A Senior Manager’s Guide. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(1), Pp. 67-70.
    21. Mirza, M.M, Safdar, R., Yu, Y., Gulzar, M.A. (2019). Managerial Empowerment and Firm Risk-Taking, International Business School, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China.
    22. O’Donnell, A. (2012). 10 Pillars of an Effective Insurance ERM Framework. Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 15, 4, PP. 1015 – 1020.
    23. Pan, K & Tian, L. (2017). Innovative efficiency and stock returns: Should we care about nonlinearity?, Finance Research Letters, 24(3),  81-89.
    24. Pagach, D., and Warr, R. (2011). The Characteristics of Firms that Hire Chief Risk Officers. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 78 (1), 185-211.
    25. Piotroski, J., Zhang, T. (2014). Politicians and the IPO decision: The impact of impending political promotions on IPO activity in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 111 (1), 111-136.
    26. Seksak, J., Sirimon, T., Panu, P and Pornsit, J. (2020). The effects of ownership concentration and corporate governance on corporate risk-taking: The case of Thailand, Evidence from Greece. Manag. Sci. 44 (3), 367–394.
    27. Sheikh, S. (2019). The impact of market competition on the relation between CEO power and firm innovation. J. Multinatl. Financial Manag. 44(4), 36–50.
    28. , Q. & Go, Z., Lee, K. (2017). Internal control weaknesses and unusual audit fees, Journal of Accounting Horizons, 21 (2), 137–152.
    29. Wang, Z., Chen, M.H., Chin, CH.L., Zheng, Q. (2017). Managerial ability, political connections, and fraudulent financial reporting in China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36 (2), 141-162.