Developing the Methods of the Performance Evaluation of VaR Models Using Fuzzy TOPSIS and Copula-ARIMA-GARCH Model

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student, Management and Economics Department, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran,Iran.

2 Department of Financial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,Iran.

10.30495/ijfma.2023.21714

Abstract

This study used the Copula-ARIMA-GARCH approach to calculate the VAR of a portfolio of four investment companies and daily data (from March/April 2009 to February/March 2017) to calculate risk more accurately and develop methods of the performance evaluation of value at risk (VaR ) models by a combination of a copula function and ARIMA/GARCH models. In this study, a novel method was proposed to evaluate the performance of VaR models using the fuzzy multicriteria decision-making models. For this purpose, ranks attained by the VaR estimation models were employed considering the unconditional coverage test procedure, Dowd’s loss function procedure, and the rank given the prediction accuracy. The results indicated that risk-taking and risk-indifferent investors assume that the VaR calculated from the Copula-ARIMA-GARCH model is the most accurate model, while risk-averse investors take the generalized extreme value (GEV ) model as the most accurate model considering the high importance of the loss function.

Keywords


Christoffersen, P.F. (1998). Evaluating Interval Forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 841-842.
2) Dowd, K. (2005). Measuring market risk. John Wiley & Sons, England,
3) Jondeau, E., &, Rockinger, M. (2006). The copula–GARCH model of conditional dependencies: An international stock market application. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(5), 827-853.
4) Chen-Tung Chen, Ching-Torng Lin, Sue-Fn Huang (2005). A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. Int. J. Production Economics, 102(2) 289–301.
5) Chun, K.H., Chun. S.H., Delson, C. (2015). Extreme risk, value at risk and expected shortfall in the gold market. International Business & Research Journal, 14(1), 107-122.
6) Hotta, L.K., Lucas, E.C., Palaro, H.P. (2008). Estimation of VAR using copula and extreme value theory. Multinational Finance Journal, 12(3/4), 205-218.
7) Huang, J.J, Lee, K.J., Liang, H., Lin, W.F. (2009). Estimating value at risk of the portfolio by conditional Copula–GARCH method, Insurance: Mathematics, 45(3), 315-324.
8) Huang, J.-J. and So, L.-C. (2018). Application of Copula-GARCH to Estimate VAR of a Portfolio with Credit Default Swaps. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 8(2), 382-407.
9) Jondeau, E., & Rockinger, M. (2006). The Copula-GARCH model of conditional dependencies: An international stock market application Journal of International Money and Finance, (25), 827-853.
10) Kellner, R., Rosch, X. (2016). Quantifying market risk with VAR or ES. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 68(c), 45-63.
11) Ngoga Kirabo Bob (2013). Value at risk estimation a GARCH-EVT-Copula approach mathematical statistic, Stockholm University master thesis, (6), 1-51.
12) Omari, C.O., Mwita, P.N. and Gichuhi, A.W. (2018). Currency Portfolio Risk Measurement with
Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic-Extreme Value Theory-Copula Model. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 8(2), 457-477.
13) Sahamkhadem. M., Stephan, A., Ostermark. R. (2018). Portfolio optimization based on GARCH-EVT-Copula forecasting models. International Journal of Forecasting, 34(3), 497-506.
14) Tang, J., Zhou,C., Yuan, Y., Sirboonchitta, S.(2014). Estimating Risk of Natural Gas Portfolios by Using GARCH-EVT-Copula Model, Creative commons attribution license, 2015, 1-7.