Implementing a Financial Reporting Model under the Web-Based Financial Reporting

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Phd Student Department of Accounting, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran.

2 Assistant Prof. , Department of Accounting, Shahrekord branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran

3 Assistant Prof. , Department of Accounting, Shahrekord branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord,

10.30495/ijfma.2023.68997.1900

Abstract

Web-based financial reporting language is considered as a standard in order to prepare, establish, exchange, and analyze information through the Internet. Therefore, financial reporting through the information disclosure on the Internet will lead to a better understanding of financial statements by users, which will increase the financial reporting readability. Therefore, this research aimed to provide a comprehensive index to measure implementing web-based financial reporting and to examine the effect of the current model on the company's financial reporting readability since 2007 to 2019. The assessment of the web-based financial reporting implementation model was through a questionnaire distributed among 60 experts from professors and financial managers, who had experience in the research field. Also, confirmatory factor analysis was used in order to measure the relationship between the latent variable of implementing web-based financial reporting and its measurement items. Results showed that the proposed model is a suitable indicator for the implementation of web-based financial reporting. Also, web-based financial reporting increased the financial reporting readability

Keywords

References

  • Ajina, A., Danielle, S., Lakhal, F. (2016). Corporate disclosures, information asymmetry and stock-market liquidity in France. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 31(4),pp. 223-238.
  • Alm El-Din, M.M., El-Awam, A.M., Ibrahim, F.M. and Hassanein, A. (2022). Voluntary disclosure and complexity of reporting in Egypt: the roles of profitability and earnings management, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23 (2),pp. 480-508.
  • Bagheri Azghandi, A., Hesarzadeh, R., and Abbaszadeh, M. (2017). The readability of financial statements and the sensitivity of investors to the use of accounting information. Financial Management Perspectives, 8(23),pp. 87-103(in Persian).
  • Bao, D., Fung, S. Y. K., and Su, L. (2018). Can shareholders be at rest after adopting clawback provisions? Evidence from stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3),pp. 1578–1615.
  • Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A., Fradeani, A. and Soverchia, M. (2021). Twenty years of XBRL: what we know and where we are going, Meditari Accountancy Research, 29 (5),pp. 1113-1145.
  • Berger, P. (2011). Challenges and opportunities in disclosure research: A discussion of 'the financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature'. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(1-2),pp. 204-218.
  • Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., Walther, B.R. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2-3),pp. 296-343
  • Bhattacharya, N., Cho, Y. J., and Kim, J. B. (2018). Leveling the playing field between large and small institutions: Evidence from the SEC’s XBRL mandate. The Accounting Review, 93(5),pp. 51–71.
  • Birt, J.L., Muthusamy, K. and Bir, P. (2017). XBRL and the qualitative characteristics of useful financial information, Accounting Research Journal, 30 No. (1),pp. 107-126.
  • Bonsall, S.B., and Miller, B.P. (2017). The impact of narrative disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt. Rev. Acc. Stud. 22 (2), pp.608–643.
  • Borgi, H. and Mnif, Y. (2022). Compliance level with IFRS disclosure requirements across 12 African countries: Do enforcement mechanisms matter?”, Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 30 (1) ,pp. 60-81.
  • Borgi, H. and Tawiah, V. (2022). Determinants of eXtensible business reporting language adoption: an institutional perspective", International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-11-2021-0242
  • Bratten, B., Gleason, C. A., Larocque, S., and Mills, L. F. (2015). Forecasting tax expense: New evidence fromanalysts (Working Paper). University of Notre Dame.
  • Cahan, Steven F. Chang, Seokjoo., Siqueira, Wei Z and Tam, Kinsun. (2021). The roles of XBRL and processed XBRL in 10-K readability. J Bus Fin Acc, pp. 1–36. DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12565.
  • Chen, C., Jia, H., Xu, Y. and Ziebart, D. (2022).The effect of audit firm attributes on audit delay in the presence of financial reporting complexity, Managerial Auditing Journal, 37 (2),pp. 283-302.
  • Chen, , Kim, J. B., Lim, J.H., and Zhou, J. (2018). XBRL adoption and bank loan contracting: Early evidence. Journal of Information Systems, 32(2),pp. 47–69.
  • Chen, J.Z., Hong, H.A., Kim, J.-B. and Ryou, J.W. (2021). Information processing costs and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from the SEC’s XBRL mandate. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 40 (2), p. 49.
  • Ching Lai, S., Yuh-Shin, L., Yi-Hung, L., and Hua-Wei, H. (2015), XBRL adoption and cost of debt. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 23 (2),pp.199 – 216.
  • Chong, D., Shi, H., and Fu, L., (Luna) et al. (2017). The impact of XBRL on information asymmetry: Evidence from loan contracting”, Journal of Management Analytics, 4 (2),pp. 145-158.
  • Cormier, D., Teller, P. and Dufour, D. (2022). The relevance of XBRL extensions for stock markets: evidence from cross-listed firms in the US", Managerial Finance, 48 (5),pp. 689-705.
  • Dadashi, I., and Nowrozi, M. (2019). Investigating the mediating effect of financial reporting readability on the relationship between earnings management and capital cost. Accounting Knowledge, 11(1),pp. 135-157 (in Persian).
  • Darogh Hazrati, F.,Taftian, A., and Moinuddin, M. (1400). Analyzing the factors affecting the content items of web-based integrated reporting with the corporate citizen approach. Management Accounting,14(50),pp. 83-100 (in Persian).
  • Du, H. and Wu, K. (2018). XBRL mandate and timeliness of financial reporting: do XBRL filings take longer?”, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 15 (1),pp. 57-75.
  • Ertugrul, M., Lei, J., Qiu, J., and Wan, C. (2017). Annual report readability, tone ambiguity, and the cost of borrowing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2),pp. 811–836.
  • Fazalahi, S., and Maleki Tawana, M. (2010). Methodology of content analysis with emphasis on readability techniques and determining the engagement coefficient of texts. Research, 2(1),pp. 71-94(in Persian).
  • Gao, M., and Huang, J. (2020). Informing the market: The effect of modern information technologies on information production. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(4),pp. 1367–1411.
  • Gerkaz, M., and Haqdadi, M. (2021). Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and the readability of financial statements. Experimental Accounting Research, 11(2),pp. 47-70 (in Persian).
  • Habib, A. (2011). Growth opportunities, earnings permanence and the valuation of free cash flow. Journal of Australasian Accounting Business and Finance, 5(4),pp. 125-139.
  • Hasan, M.M. (2017). Managerial ability, annual report readability, and disclosure tone (April 23, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/ abstract=2957135.
  • Hoitash, Rani and Hoitash, Udi, Measuring Accounting Reporting Complexity with XBRL (April 20, 2017). The Accounting Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN https://ssrn.com/abstract =2433677.
  • Hosseinpour, Y.,Yazidnia, N., and Mohammadi Khashoui, H. (1400). The impact of financial performance indicators and the consequences of financial reporting audit in companies listed in the capital market of Iran. Two chapters of value and behavioral accounting, 6(11),pp. 251-275(in Persian).
  • Karmi, G., Moradi, M., and Tavakolizadeh, R. (2018). Development of a model for acceptance and use of extensible business reporting language (XBRL) in Iran. Knowledge of Management Accounting and Auditing. 8(32),pp. 51-66 (in Persian).
  • Kim, C. F., Wang, K., and Zhang, L. (2019). Readability of 10 K reports and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(2),pp. 1184–1216.
  • Liu, C., Luo, X. and Wang, F.L. (2017). An empirical investigation on the impact of XBRL adoption on information asymmetry: Evidence from Europe”, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 93,pp. 42-50.
  • Luo, J.-h., et al. (2018). Annual report readability and corporate agency costs". ChinaJournal of Accounting Research.Vol. 11,pp. 187-212.
  • Nazimi Ardakani, M., Aref Manesh, Z., and Dehghan Dehnavi, S. (2018). The effect of Internet financial reporting on company value. Financial Accounting Empirical Research, 9(2),pp. 323-350(in Persian).
  • Nobakht, M., and Nobakht, Y. (2019). The impact of tax avoidance on accounting measures of firm value: Free cash flow for the business unit and free cash flow from the business. Empirical Studies of Financial Accounting, 17(68),pp. 119-97(in Persian).
  • Norouzi, M., Azinfar, K., Abbasi, E., and Dadashi, I. (2019). Designing a model and evaluating the moderating role of management ability on the relationship between financial reporting readability and agency cost. Financial Accounting Research, 12(1),pp. 1-18 (in Persian).
  • Norouzi, M., Azinfar, K., Abbasi, E., and Dadashi, I. (2021). Modeling the moderating role of corporate governance on the relationship between financial reporting readability and agency cost. Financial Management Strategy, 9 (2),pp. 201-223(in Persian).
  • Peng, E.Y., Shon, J. and Tan, C. (2011). XBRL and accruals: empirical evidence from China, Accounting Perspectives, Vol. 10,pp. 109-138
  • Qadiyari, N., and Amiri, E. (2019). Scientometric review of XBRL (extensible business reporting language) research in Iran. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 27(1),pp. 27-39(in Persian).
  • Rezai Pitehnoi, Y., and Safari Graili, M. (2017). Legibility of financial reporting and the possibility of fraudulent financial reporting. Financial Accounting Research, 10(4),pp. 43-58(in Persian).
  • Rezvani, F., and Brendak, S. (2018). Financial reporting readability and audit costs. Perspectives on Accounting and Management, 2(18),pp.112-126(in Persian).
  • Sakhtkoosh, Z., Moinuddin, M., and Nazimi Ardakani, M. (2017). Investigating the effect of using an extensible business reporting language on information asymmetry. Knowledge of Financial Accounting, 5(4),pp. 169-191(in Persian).
  • Saragih, A.H. and Ali, S. (2022). The effect of XBRL adoption on corporate tax avoidance: empirical evidence from an emerging country, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-09-2021-0281.
  • Sarvi, A., Talibnia, G., Pourzmani, Z., and Jahanshad, A. (2018). Studying accounting standards regarding their comprehensibility by the audience: Content analysis and readability assessment. Accounting knowledge and management audit, 8(32),pp. 31-49(in Persian).
  • Sassi, W., Ben Othman, H. and Hussainey, K. (2021). The impact of mandatory adoption of XBRL on firm’s stock liquidity: A cross-country study, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19 (2),pp. 299-324.
  • Sheikh, M., and Hassanzadeh, I. (2013). Web-based financial reporting. Accounting and Auditing Studies, 3(9),pp. 20-35(in Persian).
  • Walton, S., Yang, L. and Zhang, Y. (2021). XBRL tag extensions and tax accrual quality”, J Inf Syst, Vol. 53, 1689-1699.
  • Wang, Tawei, Yao Wen, Ching, Seng, Jia-Lang, (2014). The Association Between the Mandatory Adoption of XBRL and the Performance of Listed State-Owned Enterprises and Non-State-Owned Enterprises in China, Journal of Information & Management, 51(3),pp. 336-346.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics