Clarifying the Professional Audit Supervision Pattern

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Accounting, Qom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qom, Iran.

2 Department of Accounting, Mazandaran University, Sari, Iran.

3 Department of Accounting, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30495/ijfma.2024.76135.2078

Abstract

The aim of this research is to provide an optimal model for professional auditing oversight in the Iranian Association of Certified Public Accountants. To achieve this research goal, research data were collected by consulting experts in the field of auditing. The research population consists of knowledgeable experts in the field of auditing, and in line with the research objective, they were selected for interviews using a snowball or chain sampling method. In addition to the conducted interviews, in order to enhance the credibility and comprehensiveness of the research, documents and materials related to professional auditing oversight were carefully studied, examined, and analyzed. The results of the research indicate that monitoring compliance with laws has been identified as the primary and initial causal factor in controlling the quality of auditing institutions.
In addition to the conducted interviews, in order to enhance the credibility and comprehensiveness of the research, documents and materials related to professional auditing oversight were carefully studied, examined, and analyzed. The results of the research indicate that monitoring compliance with laws has been identified as the primary and initial causal factor in controlling the quality of auditing institutions.

Keywords

References

[1] Azar, Adel; Habashi, Naamat (2017). Presenting an Effective Model for Auditing the Public Sector of the Accounts Court of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Accounting Knowledge, 17(66), 40-5.
 
[2] Bastanian, Javad (2011). The Status of Professional Oversight of Auditors. Accountant, No. 54, 74-79.
 
[3] Piri, Parviz; Ghayour, Farzad; Pournasir, Hajar (2018). A Study of the Real Quality of Auditing Institutions in Iran Based on the Comprehensive Quality Control of the Society of Official Accountants of Iran, Sixteenth National Accounting Conference in Iran.
 
[4] Danaie-Fard, Hassan; Emami, Seyyed Mojtaba (2007). Qualitative Research Strategies: A Reflection on Data Theory, Strategic Management Thought, Volume 1, Number 2, 69-97.
 
[5] Dwani, Gholamhossein (2020). Modern Theory of Social Accounting in the Globalization Framework. Official Accountant, Number 51, 25-28.
 
[6] Keyhani, Keyhani (2020). A Brief Look at Oversight Bodies for the Auditing Profession in Iran and the World. Accountant Journal, Number 74, 77-101.
 
[7] Nasr, Mohammad Ali; Khavaji, Shokrollah; Abbassian, Ezzatollah; Aghayi, Mohammad Ali (2019). Designing a Quality Control Framework for Auditing Institutions and Regulatory Bodies in Iran Using Multifaceted Data Theory. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(30), 149-174.
 
[8] Nikbakht, Mohammadreza; Mahmoudi Khoshro, Omid (2017). Examining Factors Affecting Audit Quality in Iran with Regard to the Indicators of the Supervisory Board of Public Joint-Stock Companies. Accounting and Auditing Research, 24(3), 441-462.
 
[9] Aobdia, D. (2019). Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67(1), 144-174.
 
[10] Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage
 
[11] Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education, Inc.
 
[12] Fung, S. Y. K., Raman, K. K., & Zhu, X. K. (2017). Does the PCAOB international inspection program improve audit quality for non-US-listed foreign clients?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(1), 15-36.
 
[13] Gipper, B. (2021). The economic effects of expanded compensation disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(1), 101338.
 
[14] Hanlon, M., & Shroff, N. (2022). Insights into auditor public oversight boards: Whether, how, and why they “work”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 74(1), 101497.
 
[15] Pinello, A. S., Volkan, A. G., Franklin, J., Levatino, M., & Tiernan, K. (2019). The PCAOB audit quality indicator framework project: Feedback from stakeholders. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 16(1), 1-8.
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics