International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

Design of an Intelligent Model for Predicting Flight Safety Risk in the Approach Phase Using the BI.M-LSTM Algorithm

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. .Student, Department of Information Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran .
2 Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 professor ,Department Information Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran
4 professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/ijfma.2025.77842.2153
Abstract
The present article introduces a novel model, BI.M-LSTM, which integrates the BI algorithm with the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network to predict flight safety risks during the approach phase. Although this phase comprises only 3% of the total flight process, it is considered the most perilous stage. The proposed method involves training supervised neural networks to estimate target parameters. A standardized dataset from 2019 to 2020 was utilized, consisting of 28,813 records related to safety risk parameters such as weather conditions, aircraft configuration, flight information, speed, altitude, and air traffic. The data was summarized, cleaned, and normalized before use. Given the sequential nature of flight data and the necessity for memory retention, training was conducted using the LSTM algorithm within a Python environment. The model's mean squared error for deviations was approximately 6.38%, indicating a negligible error rate and high credibility compared to similar models. This model, enhanced with advanced tools including ETL (Extract, Transform, Load), metadata, and real-time monitoring, effectively addressed the challenges of analyzing and cleaning large-scale flight data. It successfully identified the most critical safety factor during the approach phase: control of speed and altitude during landing. This robust approach aids flight crews in managing vital safety parameters, such as preventing loss of control, maintaining appropriate aircraft speed, determining the touch-down position, and avoiding runway excursions.
Keywords

  1. Aleksandrs Bitiņs, Ruta Bogdane, Vladimir Shestakov, Anastasija Stepanova (2022)the oretical and Methodological Approaches  to The Information Base For an Airlines Flight Safety System, Transactions on Aerospace Research eISSN 2545-2835, VOL. 266, NO. 1/2022, 75-83 DOI: 10.2478/tar-2022-0006
  2. Aysha S. Hameed , Bindu G.R, Srianish Vutukuri (2024) Approach and landing guidance using constrained model predictive static programming Aerospace Science and Technology 144 (2024) 108732  journal homepage: elsevier.com/locate/aescte
  3. Baars, H. & Kemper, H.-G. (2008).“Management Support with Structured and Unstructured Data: An Integrated Business Intelligence Framework,” Information Systems Management, 25(2). 132-148.
  4. Balachandran. S and Ella. M. Atkins (2015) Flight Safety Assessment and anagement for Takeoff Using Deterministic Moore Machines JOURNAL OFAEROSPACE INFORMATION SYSTEMS Vol. 12, No. 9
  5. Borst, C., Grootendorst, F. H., Brouwer, D. I. K., Bedoya, C., Mulder, M., and van Paassen, M. M., “Design and Evaluation of a Safety Augmentation System for Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 12–22. doi:10.2514/1.C031500
  6. Chongfeng Li , Ruishan Sun , Xing Pan (2023) Takeoff runway overrun risk assessment in aviation safety based on human pilot behavioral characteristics from real flight data  Safety Science 158 (2023) 105992
  7. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  8. Eduardo Gallo(2021) Quasi Static Atmospheric Model for Aircraft Trajectory Prediction and Flight Simulation Systems and Control (eess.SY) arXiv:2101.10744v1 [eess.SY] 26 Jan 2021
  9. A. Gers, J. Schmidhuber, and F. Cummins,(1999) “Learning to forget: Continual prediction with lstm,” 1999.
  10. Gabriel Jarry, Daniel Delahaye, Eric Féron.(2020) Approach and landing aircraft on-board parameters estimation with LSTM networks. AIDA-AT 2020, 1st conference on Artificial Intelligence and Data Analytics in Air Transportation, Feb 2020, Singapore, Singapore. pp.ISBN: 978-1-7281-5381-0
  11. Govindarajan, N., De Visser, C., Van Kampen, E., Krishnakumar, K., Barlow, J., and Stepanyan, V., “Optimal Control Framework for Estimating Autopilot Safety Margins,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 7, 2015, pp. 1197–1207. doi:10.2514/1.G000271
  12. Guo Y, Sun Y (2020) Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach. PLoS ONE 15(4): e0231391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0231391
  13. Habler, Edan, Bitton, Ron & Shabtai, Asef (2021) Evaluating the Security of Aircraft Systems arXiv:2209.04028v1 [cs.CR] 8 Sep 2022
  14. Hong Sun, Fangquan Yang, Peiwen Zhang, Yang Jiao and Yunxiang Zhao (2023) An Innovative Deep Architecture for Flight Safety Risk Assessment Based on Time Series Data Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2023.030131
  15. Hsueh-Yi Lai (2023) Breakdowns in team resilience during aircraft landing due to mental model disconnects as identified through machine Reliability Engineering and System Safety 237 (2023) 109356
  16. ICAO, Doc 9859, Safety management manual, 4th ed. Montréal, Quebec, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), 2022
  17. Jing Lu, Longfei Pan, Jingli Deng, Hongjun Chai1, Zhou Ren1 and Yu Shi(2022)Deep learning for Flight Maneuver Recognition: A survey ERA, 31(1): 75–102. DOI: 10.3934/era.2023005
  18. JuanFang, QiangangZheng, ChangpengCai, HaoyinChen, HaiboZhang (2023) Deep reinforcement learning method for turbofan engine acceleration optimization
  19. Lai H-Y lee B. (2017) Unstable approach: intervention and prevention. In: Transdisciplinary engineering: a paradigm shift: proceedings of the 24th ISPE Inc. International conference on transdisciplinary engineering, July 10–14, 2017. IOS Press; 2017
  20. Mickael Rey, Daniel Aloise , François Soumis ,Romanic Pieugueu (2021) A data-driven model for safety risk identification from flight data analysis Transportation Engineering 5 (2021) 100087
  21. Ng Iris, Sarasvathi Nagalingham (2023) Implementation of Business Intelligence Solution for United Airlines (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2023
  22. PeiyaoWang, Mingxin Yu1 , Guang Yan1, Jiabin Xia, Jiawei Liu1and Lianqing Zhu(2023) A deep learning-based method for calculating aircraft wing loads Measurement and Control 1–13 _ The Author(s) 2023  Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissionsDOI: 177/00202940221145971journals.sagepub.com/home/mac
  23. Singh, G.; Singh, J.; Prabha, C. Data visualization and its key fundamentals: A comprehensive survey. In Proceedings of the 20227th International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES), Coimbatore, India, 22–24 June 2022.
  24. Tahsin Sejat Saniat, Tahiat Goni, Shaikat M. Galib (2020) LSTM RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK ASSISTED AIRCRAFT STALL PREDICTION FOR ENHANCED SITUATIONAL AWARENESS arXiv:2012.04876v1 [cs.LG] 9 Dec 2020
  25. Tejas Puranik, Evan Harrison, Sanggyu Min,Hernando Jimenez, and Dimitri Mavris (2023) General Aviation Approach and Landing Analysis using Flight Data Records Downloaded by Ecole Technologie Superieure (ETS) on December 31, 2023 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-3913
  26. Yi Lin , Linjie Deng, Zhengmao Chen, Xiping Wu, Jianwei Zhang, and Bo Yang(2020) A Real-Time ATC Safety Monitoring nramework Using a Deep Learning Approach IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL. 21, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 2020
  27. Zhi lu et al (2018) An Architecture of system of system (SoS) for Commerical flight Security in 5G 5th internatonal conferarancr on system and informatics (ICSAL 2018)
  28. Zhu, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, F.(2022) Energy Price Prediction Integrated with Singular Spectrum Analysis and Long Short-Term Memory Network against the Background of Carbon eutrality. Energies 2022, 15, 8128. [CrossRef]