International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

Presenting a regulatory governance model for the country's industrial development in medical equipment based on the Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method (MCDM-Fuzzy)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
alireza bashiri 1
Gholamreza Memarzadeh Tehran 2
Hajieh Rajabi Farjad 3
zahra moghimi 4
1 Department of Public Administration UAE.C., Islamic Azad University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
2 Department of Public Administration, SR.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Human Resources Management, Amin University of Law Enforcement Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Public Administration, SE.C., Islamic Azad University, Semnan, Iran
10.22034/ijfma.2025.78567.2266
Abstract
Abstract:
The present research studies and prioritizes the components of the country's industrial development regulatory governance in medical equipment . to maintain national health and maintain social health in the domestic and foreign dimensions, determining a model for implementing regulatory governance and achieving these goals can be an effective step in achieving the country's industrial development regulatory governance in medical equipment. The statistical population of this study is managers and experts in the field of regulatory governance and medical equipment production and distribution industries in Tehran. The present study is a survey and applied type, in which 12 experts were identified in the qualitative section and interviews were conducted to identify effective components. In the quantitative part, using the fuzzy ANP technique, the identified components were prioritized based on the experts' views in two stages using pairwise comparisons. The results indicate that the most important factor affecting the governance of medical equipment regulation is political and legal factors, the most important component of which is transparency; in second place are social and technical factors, the most important component of which is culture and public customs; in third place is the structure of the regulatory system, the most important component of which is post-release monitoring and evaluation; in fourth place are structural and technical factors, the most important component of which is medical equipment life cycle management; and in last place are the economy and the market, the most important component of which is market diversity. below
Keywords
Regulatory governance
medical equipment
industrial development of the country
approachANP Fuzzy

  • ·       Adams, Tracy L., (2013). Professional Self-Regulation and the Public Interest in Canada, presented at the ISA RC52 Interim Conference on Challenging Professionalism, The School of Economics and Management (ISEG), Lisbon, Portugal, November 29.

    ·       Amiri, Ayoub; Rizqi Rostami, Alireza; Gollard, Parvaneh and Salehi Sedqiani, Jamshid (2018). Developing a model of good governance in the defense sector of the Islamic Republic of Iran, PhD thesis, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch.

    ·       Avon, Hughes. Translated by Alvani, Khalili Shorini and Mamarzadeh (2019). Modern Public Administration.:A strategic approach, the course of thoughts, concepts and theories. Tehran: Morvarid Publications.

    ·       Benz, A., (2011). Governance - Modebegriff oder nützliches sozialwissenschaftliches Konzept?, In Governance - Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    ·       Danaei Fard, Hassan (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of regulators as a tool for eliminating problems in the state management process: understanding the rationale, implementation process and challenges ahead, Iranian Public Administration Studies, Volume 6, Number 4, 1-28.

    ·       DÖHLER, M. (2011). Regulation. In the Sage Handbook of Governance, ed. M. Bevier. Los Angeles and London: Sage, pp. 524 n. 4. DORF, M. 2003. The domain of reflexive law. Columbia Law Review, 103: 384, 386.

    ·       Eftekhari; Rokn al-Din (2018). Governance and Sustainable Development of Settlements, Scientific Association of Urban Planning and Regional Development, Allameh Tabatabaei University andScientific Association of Land PlanningTarbiat Modares University.

    ·       Fryatt R, Bennett S & Soucat A. (2023). Health sector governance: Should we be investing more? British Medical Journal Global Health 2(2): 1-6

    ·       Hadavand, Mehdi (2005). Good Governance, Development and Citizen Rights, Fundamental Rights No. 4, page 52.

    ·       Kim, Junhewk; Kim, So Yoon; Kim, Eun-Ae; Sim, Jin-Ah; Lee, Yuri & Kim, Hannah (2024). Developing a Framework for Self-regulatory Governance in Healthcare AI Research: Insights from South Korea, Perspective Open access, Published: Volume 16, pages 391-406.

    ·       Memarzadeh, Gholamreza; Mohammadiha, Haleh; Azimi, Parhan (2011). Designing a Model for Improving the National Health System with Emphasis on Governance Strategies, Payavard Salamat Journal, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp. 290-272.

    ·       Mishra, Brajesh (2023). Profiling regulatory governance framework to strengthen industry performance: Application of the fuzzy analytical hierarchical process, International Journal of Technology Policy and Management 23(3) DOI:10.1504/IJTPM.10058047.

    ·       Mousavi Seyed Ali, Mazhari Mohammad, Molaei Ayat, Malkooti Hashjin Seyed Hossein. The relationship between regulatory governance and the evolution of public administration in France; moving from a state-centered order to structured pluralism. Administrative Law. 1402; 10 (35):187-210.

    ·       OECD (2005), "The benefits of liberalizing product markets and reducing barriers to international trade and investment: the case of the United States and the European Union," Economics Department Working Paper No. 432, OECD, Paris.

    ·       OECD (2023), "Regulatory sandboxes in artificial intelligence", OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 356, OECD Publishing, Paris,https://doi.org/10.1787/8f80a0e6-en.

    ·       OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, (2024). Regulatory Experimentation: Moving ahead on the Agile Regulatory Governance Agenda, the use of this work, whether digital or print, is governed by the Terms and Conditions to be found at https://www.oecd.org/termsandconditions/.

    ·       Offe, Claus, (2000). Civil Society and Social Order: Demarcating and Combining Market, State and Community, Revue Europeanness de Sociologies XLI.

    ·       Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    ·       Rasek and Hosseini-Karabi (2016). The concept of regulation in the realm of law. Bi-quarterly Encyclopedia of Economic Law. Issue 8. P. 32.

    ·       Research Center‎The Islamic Consultative Assembly (2018). National Regulatory System, the Concept of Regulatory and Its Relationship with the Governance System, Deputy for Economic Research, Office: Public Sector Economic Studies, Subject Code: 230, Serial Number: 15940

    ·       Ribeiro, D. (2018), Adaptive Regulatory Impact Assessment: Beyond the Foresight-Hindsight Divide, PhD Thesis, Unpublished.

    ·       Safari Nasrani, Hossein, Kohandel, Mehdi Nourbakhsh, Mahvash and Nourbakhsh Parivosh (2013). The effect of supervisory governance on human resource development with the mediating role of political behavior of employees of the Ministry of Sports and Youth of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Studies in Sports and Youth, No. 60, 127-144.

    ·       Santos, Boaventura de Sousa, (2002). Towards a New Legal Common Sense, Butterworths, London.

    ·       Scott, Colin (2002). Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance, Journal of Law and Society 29.

    ·       Scott. Colin (2003). Regulation in the Age of Governance: The Rise of the PostRegulatory State, National Europe Center Paper No. 100

    • Thomas M, Zhang YF (2020) Regulatory reform and governance: a survey of selected developing and transition economies. Institute for Development Policy and Management, School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester, UK and World Bank Group, Washington, DC, USA, pp 1–28.