International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

Providing a sustainable supply chain evaluation model based on sustainability reporting

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Accounting, Sa.C., Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Abstract
A sustainable supply chain entails incorporating social, economic, and environmental considerations into all organizational processes, spanning the entire supply chain lifecycle. Given that such a chain influences sustainability reporting, the aim of this research is to propose a sustainable supply chain assessment model based on sustainability reporting. The study employed the Grounded Theory method and covered the years 1404 and 1405 (Solar Hijri). During the Grounded Theory phase, interviews were conducted with 20 experts familiar with the various stages of the supply chain in cement companies. The findings from the grounded theory phase were categorized into six main axes and fifteen sub-axes. The six main axes comprised research and development, operational factors, the current situation, planning factors, company growth factors, and final performance. Specifically, research and development represented the causal conditions; operational factors, the core phenomenon; the current situation, the contextual conditions; planning factors, the intervening conditions; company growth factors, the strategies; and final performance, the consequences. To achieve sustainable reporting, companies must address the key axes of the sustainable supply chain, and these factors must be implemented simultaneously. This model is applicable to cement companies for improving their sustainability reporting.

Keywords: Sustainable supply chain, sustainability reporting, grounded theory.
Keywords

1.      Adibizadeh Lanjani,N , Asgharizadeh,E and Alipour Darvishi,Z . (2025). scenario planning 20-year of financial managers on the role of blockchain in the supply chain with a collective agreement approach in listed companies. (e24225). International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, (), e24225 doi: 10.22034/ijfma.2025.78852.2319
2.      Barrett, J., Scott, A., (2001). The ecological footprint: a metric for corporate sustainability. Corporate Environmental Strategy 8, 316–325.
3.      Egbunike, Francis Chinedu, Ogbodo, Okenwa C.Y., Onyali, Chidiebele Innocent, (2014), Utilizing Strategic Management Accounting Techniques (SMATs) for Sustainability Performance Measurement, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting,  Vol 5, No 13, pp. 140-153.
4.      Gutterman, Alan S., Stakeholder Theory (March 13, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4387595 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4387595
5.      Johnstone, L., Yates, D. and Nylander, S. (2023), "Taking shape within the structural and the personal: sustainability accountability within a Swedish public sector organisation", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 287-312.
6.      Madhani, Pankaj M., (2010). Resource Based View (RBV) of Competitive Advantage: An Overview (March 26, 2010). Resource Based View: Concepts And Practices, Pankaj Madhani, ed., pp. 3 -22, Icfai University Press, Hyderabad, India, 2009 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1578704
7.      Marco, Bagliani, Martini, Fiorenzo (2012), A joint implementation of ecological footprint methodology and cost accounting techniques for measuring environmental pressures at the company level, Ecological Idicators, www.elsevier.com: p.p 148-156.
8.      Mercia Group, (2022), Introducing the Future of Sustainability Accounting: ESG, 17 August 2022 13:36, available at https://www.mercia-group.com/mercia-news-and-blog/sustainability-accounting-esg/.
9.      Narendra, Kumar, Krishna, Kumar, Anurag, Aeron, Filippo, Verre, (2025), Blockchain technology in supply chain management: Innovations, applications, and challenges, Telematics and Informatics Reports, Volume 18, June 2025, 100204
10.  Nica, I., Chiriță, N., & Georgescu, I. (2025). Triple Bottom Line in Sustainable Development: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, 17(5), 1932. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051932
11.  Rezaee,Z . (2018). Integrating Business Sustainability into Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 3(9), 1-15.
12.  Sandeep Singh & Samir K. Srivastava, 2021. "Decision support framework for integrating triple bottom line (TBL) sustainability in agriculture supply chain," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(2), pages 387-413, November.
13.  Song, Lei and Guo, Xiaolong and Xu, Fasheng and Chen, Yu, (2026), Smart Contracts and Inventory-Based Financing in Supply Chains (January 18, 2026). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6091528.
14.  Taj, Saud A., (2016). "Application of signaling theory in management research: Addressing major gaps in theory," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 338-348.

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 26 September 2026