International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting

Examining the Role of Markov Switching in Predicting Volatility in the Tehran Stock Exchange Based on Regional Market Fluctuations Using Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) Models

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Business management, Ra.C.,Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2 Assistant Prof Economics and Accounting Group, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.
10.22034/ijfma.2025.78720.2301
Abstract
This study investigates the role of Markov switching in predicting volatility in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE), incorporating the influence of international market fluctuations (with a focus on regional markets) using Heterogeneous Autoregressive (HAR) models. The research employs 30-minute interval data from the TEPIX index and international indices (including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Dubai, and Turkey) over the period 2022–2024 to model volatility through a Markov regime-switching approach. Key findings reveal that volatility regime shifts in the TSE follow a persistent pattern: a low-volatility regime exhibits a 92% probability of persistence, whereas a high-volatility regime shows only a 25–35% chance of stability. Regional stock market fluctuations play a moderating role during high-volatility regimes, mitigating the amplification of domestic volatility. Negatively correlated markets (e.g., Saudi Arabia) highlight geopolitical influence. The results indicate that Markov regime-switching models, combined with international variables, serve as an effective tool for forecasting TSE volatility. These insights can assist policymakers in risk management and help investors optimize trading strategies.
Keywords

  1. Abtahi, S. Y., & Nikfetrat, H. (2012). Identifying regime switching of stock market returns in Iran. Economic Modeling, 20, 41–56.
  2. Andersen & Bollerslev (1998). "Answering the Skeptics: Yes, Standard Volatility Models Do Provide Accurate Forecasts". International Economic Review.
  3. ansarinasab, M. and m, Z. (2019). Investigation of Nonlinear Exchange Rate Behavior in Iran: Evidence from Markov Switching Model. Journal of Iranian Economic Issues, 6(1), 21-40. doi: 10.30465/ce.2019.4916
  4. Arab Mazar, M. and Ghasemi, M. (2010). Pricing Initial Public Offerings: combining Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithm. Accounting and Auditing Review, 16(4)
  5. Bekaert, G., & Harvey, C. R. (2000). "Foreign Speculators and Emerging Equity Markets". Journal of Finance
  6. Corsi, F. (2009). A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 7, 174–196.
  7. Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). "Measuring Financial Asset Return and Volatility Spillovers". *Journal of Econometrics
  8. Duan, Y., Chen, W., Zeng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). Leverage effect, economic policy uncertainty and realized volatility with regime switching. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 493, 148–154.
  9. Duan., Yinying, Chen., Wang,  Zeng., Qing, Liu., Zhicao (2018), Leverage effect, economic policy uncertainty and realized volatility with regime switching, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, volume 493, page 148-154.
  10. Engle, R. F. (2002). "Dynamic Conditional Correlation". Journal of Business & Economic Statistics.
  11. Fallahpour, S., & Motaharinia, V. (2016). Including jump components in modeling and forecasting realized volatility: Evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange. Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management, 7(2), 171–190.
  12. French (1980). "Stock Returns and the Weekend Effect". Journal of Financial Economics.
  13. Gibbons, M. R., & Hess, P. (1981). "Day of the Week Effects and Asset Returns". Journal of Business.
  14. Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). "A Forecast Comparison of Volatility Models". Journal of Applied Econometrics.
  15. Kaminsky, G., & Schmukler, S. (2003). "Short-Run Pain, Long-Run Gain: The Effects of Financial Liberalization". NBER Working Paper.
  16. Leung, Mark T., Daouk, H., & Chen, An-Sing (2000). Forecasting stock indices: A comparison of classification and level estimation models. International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 173-190.
  17. Liu, J., Ma, F., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Forecasting the Chinese stock volatility across global stock markets. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 525,466–477.
  18. Liu, Jia, Chen, Zhiping (2018), Time consistent multi-period robust risk measures and portfolio selection models with regime-switching, European Journal of Operational Research, Volume 268, Issue 1, Pages 373-385.
  19. Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1988). Stock market prices do not follow random walks: Evidence from a simple specification test, Review of Financial Studies, 1, 41-66.
  20. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.
  21. Mirzaee, M. (2018). Analysis of Realized Volatility in Tehran Stock Exchange using Heterogeneous Autoregressive Models Approach. Financial Research Journal, 20(3), 365-388. doi: 10.22059/frj.2018.255568.1006657
  22. Moradi, M., Sedoughi Yazdi, H., & Abdollahian, J. (2015). A New Engineering Approach to Forecast Tehran Securities Exchange Indices Volatility. Journal of Accounting Advances, Shiraz University, 7(2).
  23. Raggi, D., & Bordignon, S. (2012). Long memory and nonlinearities in realized volatility: A Markov switching approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 56,3730–3742.
  24. Shi, Y., & Ho, K.-Y. (2015). Long memory and regime switching: A simulation study on the Markov regime-switching ARFIMA model. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, S189–S204.
  25. Swan. Mitra (2020), Downside risk measurement in regime switching stochastic volatility, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2020.112845
  26. Tsay, R. S. (2005). *Analysis of Financial Time Series*. Wiley.
  27. Yu, Lean, Wang, Shouyang, & Lai, K. K. (2009). Intelligent computational methods for financial engineering. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Decision Sciences, Article ID 394731, doi:10.1155/2009/394731, 2 pages